← All case studies
ManufacturingTechnologyFinOps

Hybrid Cloud Cost Management

Explore a common view of cloud and on-premises costs, with clearer ownership, shared-cost allocation and savings decisions for finance and infrastructure teams.

01

Compare cloud and on-premises cost categories

02

Understand who owns shared spending

03

Review cost-saving options with service owners

Video walkthrough · An illustrative hybrid cost-management workflow with representative financial figures. Open video

Industry
Manufacturing
Focus
FinOps
Inputs
Billing records, on-premises costs and allocation rules
Teams
FinOps, finance, infrastructure and service owners

The business situation

Where this fits

Cloud bills and on-premises costs are often reported differently. Shared services add another layer of ambiguity, making it difficult to explain spending, assign ownership or compare cost-saving options fairly.

For organisations whose cost decisions span cloud platforms, data centres and shared infrastructure.

  • Cloud and on-premises reports cannot be compared easily.
  • Shared costs are disputed or left unallocated.
  • Savings discussions lack a named operational owner.

The solution

How the solution helps

A hybrid cost-management workflow brings spending categories, allocation rules and planning assumptions into one discussion. Teams can explore ownership, compare budget scenarios and review possible changes with the people responsible for the affected services.

01

Build a common cost view

Align reporting periods, cost categories and the treatment of shared services.

02

Assign accountable owners

Make allocation rules and ownership clear enough for finance and service teams to review.

03

Compare possible changes

Review the cost assumptions and operational trade-offs behind each option.

In practice

Explain a rise in shared infrastructure spend

Explore how finance and infrastructure teams can review a cost change together.

What goes in

Billing periods, service ownership, on-premises cost inputs and allocation rules.

  1. Compare like-for-like costs

    Align the categories and periods used in the review.

    OutputA common basis for the discussion.

  2. Review ownership and allocation

    Inspect which teams use the shared service and how its costs are assigned.

    OutputAn explainable allocation view.

  3. Assess the next step

    Compare possible changes with their service impact and approval requirements.

    OutputA cost decision to review with the accountable owner.

How it works

How the workflow comes together

Cost sources

Choose the billing and on-premises inputs needed for the selected reporting scope.

Allocation model

Make ownership and shared-service rules part of the cost view.

Decision workflow

Bring scenarios, assumptions and owner approval into the same discussion.

  • Cloud billing information
  • On-premises cost model
  • Shared-cost allocation
  • Budget and scenario analysis

Customer value

What this means for your team

In the workflow

Costs that teams can explain

A shared cost model helps finance and service owners ask the same questions using the same reporting assumptions.

Why it matters

Better cost conversations

Support more consistent allocation, clearer budget ownership and cost decisions that account for service needs.

Review and control

Keep people in control

  • Keep allocation assumptions visible and agreed by finance.
  • Separate estimated opportunity from realised savings.
  • Require service-owner approval before operational changes.

Get started

Start with your use case

Start with one shared service or cost category where finance and infrastructure teams need a common view.

Useful starting information

  • A selected billing period
  • On-premises cost and ownership inputs
  • Agreed shared-service allocation rules

Success measures to track

  • Cost and ownership coverage
  • Allocation questions resolved
  • Time spent preparing the cost review

Fit with your existing systems

Agree the initial billing sources, cost categories and service-owner review process before expanding coverage.

View all
Technology · AI governanceAI Agent Governance and Cost Control
A representative walkthrough of agent ownership, activity, cost and review workflows.Read the case study
Technology

AI Agent Governance and Cost Control

Give AI platform teams a clearer view of agent ownership, activity and spending, with review workflows for budgets and policy decisions.

  • Connect each agent to an accountable owner
  • Review activity and spending in one place
  • Support budget reviews and audit preparation
Read case study
Public safety · Video intelligenceAI Video Search for Security Investigations
A search and investigation walkthrough using recorded sample footage and human review.Read the case study
Public safety

AI Video Search for Security Investigations

Search recorded footage by description or reference image, inspect the matching moments and bring selected clips into a human-reviewed investigation.

  • Search footage using words or a reference image
  • Inspect source clips and surrounding context
  • Organise selected evidence for investigator review
Read case study
Technology · GPU orchestrationGPU Capacity Planning and Allocation
An illustrative GPU-capacity workflow using sample requests, queues and usage records.Read the case study
Technology

GPU Capacity Planning and Allocation

Explore how AI teams can request GPU capacity, understand queues and placement rules, and review usage across shared infrastructure.

  • Make capacity requests and constraints clear
  • Explain why workloads wait or need different resources
  • Connect usage with the teams requesting it
Read case study

Your next conversation

Which part of your infrastructure spend is hardest to explain?

Tell us how your team works today. We’ll explore the information, integrations and review process that fit your use case.

Discuss this use case